Showing posts with label education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education. Show all posts

Saturday, May 31, 2025

Jane Austen, Debated: Part Two

Jane Austen, Debated

Harville University’s Top Professors Clash Over Whether The Novelist Deserves a Place on the University’s Required Reading List 

The debate has now been going on for some time, and the two professors, Dr. Helen Croft and Dr. Augusta Hawkins, have each finished answering the first question: "Do Jane Austen’s works have intellectual as well as entertainment value, and is her fame justified?" If you missed the first installment, read it here. Otherwise – please enjoy the second episode, as the professors debate Jane Austen's influence! Let us hope that despite the heated topic, the debate continues as calmly and uneventfully as it started...

Dean Hunsford: “Our next topic is this: do Jane Austen’s novels influence her readers, and is this influence good or bad? Dr. Croft will begin.”

Dr. Croft: “I am certain that Jane Austen’s novels influence her readers for good beyond the delight they give. Jane Austen has wisdom to offer on many topics – friendship, money, character, courage, education – but I’ll begin with the subject she’s most often associated with: romantic relationships.

Jane Austen is the antithesis of other authors of romance novels in the way she depicts healthy relationships with clarity and realism. Rather than providing a romantic escape from reality, her novels provide remarkable insight about how to marry wisely. The novels have many similarities, but are each so distinct that generalizations about them are apt to fail; although her emphasis on good character, self-knowledge, and friendship runs through all her writing.


Jane Austen puts an unusual emphasis on the kindness and integrity of her characters, particularly as shown through their behavior in society – mutual compatibility and “being in love” is not her only or even her most important concern in the relationships of her heroines. Men whose courtesy and consideration only extends to people of importance or people they like do not make good husbands! 


Her heroes reveal their good character in various ways: Edward Ferrars’ loyalty to scheming Lucy Steele, whom he does not love, prefigures the loyalty he will show to his real beloved, Elinor Dashwood; Mr. Darcy rescues Lydia Bennet (at great cost to himself) from a disgrace that would wreck her family, but does his utmost to conceal this kindness from Elizabeth Bennet rather than use it to win her; Mr. Knightley consistently treats marginalized characters with unusual respect and courtesy, showing kindness to the Bateses, Jane Fairfax, and Robert Martin, among others; Edmund Bertram takes the time to comfort his little cousin Fanny when nobody else even notices her misery; and all the heroes treat their mothers and sisters with respect and courtesy, even when those family members are very disagreeable. 


Jane Austen’s villains, however, reveal their bad character through various lapses in courtesy whose significance we are likely to overlook until a drastic action makes their self-centeredness obvious. Men who flirt with other women (Henry Crawford), or who are unkind to younger sisters (John Thorpe), or who don’t treat their elderly relatives with respect (John Willoughby), or who are unreliable when it comes to commitments (William Elliot), or who are eager to exchange unkind gossip (George Wickham) make bad husbands now just as they did then. Considering the risk women face of intimate partner violence and domestic abuse, Jane Austen’s portrayal of subtle red flags is as relevant as ever.

 

Another dual theme that runs through Jane Austen’s works is that of self-knowledge and self-improvement. Characters like Elizabeth Bennet, Marianne Dashwood, Emma Woodhouse, Edmund Ferrars, and Captain Wentworth learn to acknowledge their mistakes and see themselves more clearly; and they use their hard-won self-knowledge to try to fix their errors and do better in the future. Elizabeth Bennet is forthright in acknowledging her flaws and the blunders they have led her into. But she does not brood over her mistakes and fall into depression; she resolves to combat her flaws and do better in the future. Marianne starts out by letting her misery take over her life and make her family miserable as well, but by the end, she emulates Elinor in facing disappointment with resolution and industry rather than sinking into dangerous depression (which causes her nearly fatal illness). Fanny has a different challenge to overcome: rather than recognizing mistakes, she must find the courage to stand up for herself when she is put under immense pressure to yield to her family’s wishes. Her cousin Edmund, in this novel, is the one who falls for someone charming but immoral; he must learn to see past Mary Crawford’s wit and liveliness to her selfish heart and to recognize Fanny’s true worth. Jane Austen’s protagonists all face relatable hardships that come from the inside and the outside, and they manage to navigate these obstacles with resilience, cheerfulness, and integrity. All of them can show us how to better navigate our own difficulties. 


Jane Austen has a particular relevance to modern readers through her emphasis on and depiction of social interaction. She highlights the essentialness of having a circle of friends, acquaintances, relatives, and neighbors, in addition to being with that one special person we’d all like to find. Some of the movie adaptations are particularly misleading when it comes to this aspect: Jane Austen never leaves the happy couple alone with their love as the curtain falls, two newlyweds staring into each other’s eyes for fictional eternity. Instead (thank goodness!) she sees to it that they end up surrounded by a specific circle of friends and relatives who will ensure their future happiness as much as their marriage will. This final circle of friends is often set up throughout the novel, and often pointedly excludes unpleasant family members and acquaintances as much as it includes deserving relatives. (Elizabeth and Jane are happily settled near each other but not too near their parents, for instance; Fanny’s final circle at Mansfield is mercifully free of her Aunt Norris; and Elinor and Marianne end up practically next door to each other, with John and Fanny Dashwood miles away.) This social network surrounding the hero and heroine is often literally as well as figuratively the final scene of the novel: four out of the six novels end with a reference to the couple’s final happiness within the circle of their friends and family.


Jane Austen's complex portrayal of good romantic relationships and relationship red flags, her emphasis on good character and self-knowledge, and the importance she places on finding friendship are only a few of the ways in which her writing has the potential to change her readers' lives for the better."


Dr. Hawkins: “I find Jane Austen’s novels to contain several morals that are highly outdated and inappropriate for young adults today. Jane Austen romanticizes life in a way that can be very harmful for young women in particular, who need encouragement to follow their ambitions and not spend more time obsessing over their romantic relationships. These days, our goal for our daughters is not to get them married as quickly as possible, at seventeen, eighteen, nineteen – it’s to see them finish their education and learn to support themselves before, hopefully, they find a good man and perhaps decide to get married. And if they never find someone they want to marry, that’s fine too! Wouldn’t you rather see a girl going out with her friends than sitting at home watching “Pride and Prejudice” and hoping a Mr. Darcy will turn up for her? And not all of Jane Austen’s marriages look as positive even as that of Elizabeth and Darcy. Emma Woodhouse and Marianne Dashwood both marry men more than 15 years older than they are. Elinor Dashwood marries a man who didn’t tell her he was engaged to someone else; Fanny Price marries a cousin of hers whom she has known since she was 10 and he was 16. These relationships do not look healthy to me! And all of these girls (most are in their teens) will agree, according to English law, to obey their husbands during that ceremony where, as Emma says, “N. takes M. for better, for worse.” I am afraid that for some of these girls it really would be “for worse,” and I certainly don’t think we want young women today imitating these characters. 


Another alarming aspect of Austen’s novels is the way women are constantly set up as rivals to each other over male attention: Elizabeth vs. Miss Bingley, Elinor vs. Lucy, Fanny Price vs. Mary Crawford – the list goes on. Women should think of other women as friends, not as rivals or obstacles to a marriage with 'The One.' "


Just as Dr. Hawkins is drawing breath to continue, Dr. Croft interrupts. 


Dr. Croft: “Excuse me, Mr. Hunsford! I would like to request two minutes for a rebuttal due to Dr. Hawkins’s misrepresentations of Austen’s works.”


A murmur of astonishment wafts across the audience as the listeners lean forward in their seats. Dean Hunsford looks highly uncomfortable as he coughs for silence. 


Dean Hunsford: “This, er, is all very irregular, and I’m not sure that – er, this is not quite – not quite –” 


Dr. Croft interrupts this incoherent protest with such decision that the dean subsides into uneasy silence. Dr. Hawkins looks like she wants to interrupt, but cannot quite muster the decision or the volume necessary to effect this – so Dr. Croft carries on. 


Dr. Croft: “My opponent’s objections to Jane Austen sound damning indeed, but they are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of her novels. Austen cannot be blamed for modern cinematic misrepresentation of her novels or with the diluting romanticization of modern sequels that twist their meanings into something Austen never intended. Her heroine Catherine Morland learns exactly this lesson when her obsession with gothic novels threatens her happiness in the real world. Austen’s heroines are all active and engaged in their communities, not sitting about waiting for Prince Charming. They read, and think deeply about their reading; they draw, play the piano, sing, ride, and dance; they go for long walks and visit friends and relatives, they run households, care for family members, and do works of charity for their communities. Yes, two of Jane Austen’s seven heroines marry with an unusual age gap, but these marriages are founded on mutual respect and great affection – the quality of the relationship is not defined by the ages of the couple. All of the heroines marry well within the accepted social norms of the era, although these norms have changed somewhat since, and all of these marriages look healthy even in our modern world. Considering the many changes for the better that have occurred with respect to marriages and relationships since the Regency era, it is really remarkable that all of Jane Austen’s heroines choose relationships that are so evidently good even by the standards of our era. 


Contrary to Dr. Hawkins’s assertion of female rivalry, Jane Austen emphasizes the importance of social connection outside romantic relationships, and is noteworthy for the close and realistic friendships she portrays, particularly between women. These friendships can occasionally be fraught, such as Elizabeth’s disappointment with her friend Charlotte’s decision to marry Mr. Collins, but more often female friendships are a source of encouragement and good advice for the heroines. Notable examples are Emma and Mrs. Weston, Catherine Morland and Eleanor Tilney, and sisters Elinor and Marianne Dashwood as well as Elizabeth and Jane Bennet. Jane Austen also, and unusually, portrays close platonic friendships across genders: Elinor and Colonel Brandon, Jane Fairfax and the Knightley brothers, and Anne Elliot and Captain Benwick are some examples.


Jane Austen depicts friendships and rivalries in a way that reflects the complexity of real world relationships. Yes, women can be rivals; but they can also be friends, and rivals can even become friends – such as Emma and Jane Fairfax. Many criticisms of Jane Austen’s work arise from a fundamental misunderstanding of her subtlety and her historical context, and I will address these further in the next section of the debate."


Dr. Hawkins (very frostily): “If I may continue – even as a romance author Jane Austen is deficient. Her romances are heavily money-driven, making her characters emotionally unsympathetic. Most of her heroines seem motivated – like Charlotte Lucas – by a wish to leave their family and have a grand home of their own, rather than by a great affinity with their husbands-to-be. Many of these young women are escaping from stifling homes where they are expected to be accountable to strict, unreasonable parents for all their actions, and rushing into marriage while still being teenagers is apparently their best option. None of Austen’s heroines so much as consider trying to earn their own living – a difficult but not impossible thing for women in the 1800s. 


Jane Austen’s own life, as well, is hardly a good recommendation of her works. She never married – as far as we know, she never even had a serious romantic relationship. Like her heroines, she never found independence, living with her family on the income of her father and brothers all her life. Only four of her novels were published in her lifetime, earning her only a few hundred pounds; and Jane Austen was dismissive of her own writing, calling her work 'the little bit (two inches wide) of ivory on which I work with so fine a brush as produces little effect after much labour.' It’s no wonder that an author who experienced such a paucity of events in her own life should write novels that lack reality and emotional honesty."


Thus ends this second installment...but come back soon to read the thrilling conclusion of the Jane Austen debate! Which arguments do you find most intriguing, absurd, or compelling? Leave a comment and tell me! 

Liv Quicksilver





Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Jane Austen, Debated: Part One

 Jane Austen, Debated

Harville University’s Top Professors Clash Over Whether The Novelist Deserves a Place on the University’s Required Reading List 

The latest furor at Harville University, a small but respected liberal arts school in New England, revolves around the author Jane Austen. The question at hand is whether her name should remain on the new and updated list of “required reading” for all graduates, or whether she ought to be relegated to the longer “optional recommendations” list to join several of her contemporaries. Arguments on both sides are heated. Tonight, the night before the board convenes to vote on the Jane Austen question, two respected professors at Harville are having a formal debate on the topic, and Harville’s auditorium is packed. Head Dean Charles Hunsford is moderating; he introduces the night’s two speakers. 


Dean Hunsford (speaking brightly but looking rather harried): “Hello everyone! Good evening! Please welcome our two distinguished speakers tonight, debating whether or not Jane Austen deserves a place on our required reading list: Friends, please give a rousing welcome to Dr. Helen Croft and Dr. Alexandra Hawkins!


The audience supplies the customary applause with unusual enthusiasm as the two women walk onto the stage and shake hands; then each one composedly shuffles her notes into order at her podium as the applause dies away to expectant silence. Dean Hunsford announces the rules, after which Dr. Croft has the floor for her opening statement. 


Dr. Helen Croft: “Good evening to all of you, and thank you for coming here tonight. I am here to speak in favor of retaining Harville’s requirement that all students read at least two novels by Jane Austen before graduating. I believe this is not only important but essential to our mission of “invigorating the reason and inspiring the imagination” of all our students. Jane Austen is one of the greatest authors in the English language, and her novels hold value even for those who dislike or are indifferent towards them. She has a unique place among the many famous authors taught in our English department in that she is widely studied by scholars as well as being widely beloved and read for pure enjoyment. Her novels speak to our experiences and emotions with the same clarity they have had for over 200 years. And although I don’t propose forcing every student to like Jane Austen, a basic knowledge of her works and appreciation for her literary talent is an indispensable part of a well-rounded education. Her novels span such a wide range in tone, in their characters, and in the lessons they have to teach us that reading a minimum of two is essential to understanding Austen’s enduring influence as a writer. I hope that my arguments tonight will gain your support in keeping Jane Austen a part of Harville’s curriculum.”


Dr. Alexandra Hawkins: “Good evening once again, and thank you for your presence here. I believe that as times change, so do the essential elements in a good education, and that Harville is on a path of continuous improvement. The next step on this path is to re-evaluate our graduation requirements and remove the requirements that are no longer relevant to students in 2024, and Jane Austen – although she may once have been – is no longer among the handful of authors who transcend their time to speak to ours. Rather, she belongs on our secondary list of authors who are read for their historical value or as an extension of specific studies, as well as, of course (with a smile), in the Regency romance sections of bookstores. Making this change will not take away the enjoyment of Jane Austen from those who happen to like her; it will simply remove the obligation of wading through long, convoluted sentences about Regency social conventions and courtships from students who already have too many reading assignments. (There is a murmur of agreement at Dr. Hawkins’s remark about “too many reading assignments.”) I hope that you will all support me in making this necessary change to our graduation requirements. “ 


Dean Hunsford: “Now, the first question for our speakers to tackle is this: Do Jane Austen’s works have intellectual as well as entertainment value, and is her fame justified? Dr. Hawkins, perhaps you would go first this time.” 


Dr. Hawkins: “This highlights an interesting aspect of the question of relevance, because Jane Austen obviously has entertainment value for masses of people: one glance at the number of Austen-inspired movies, sequels, and spinoffs is evidence of that. But the fact that people love movies with beautiful actresses in Regency gowns who are proposed to by rich, handsome gentlemen, or that anything with “Mr. Darcy” on it flies off the shelves does not make Jane Austen intellectually relevant to today’s reality. I’m sure that many of my listeners enjoy reading Jane Austen, but I’m equally sure that you also enjoy other books that you wouldn’t dream of making mandatory for all students. Why should Jane Austen be the exception? Her novels may have amused the white upper class society of the Regency era, but the fame such accolades earned her is no longer justified in the modern day. Our students deserve to read books that will give them the tools and philosophy they need to live here and now, not books about why Elizabeth shouldn’t flirt with Mr. Wickham or how Robert Martin is beneath Miss Woodhouse’s notice. The other works on our required reading list have earned their place on it because of their honesty – sometimes brutal honesty! – in speaking to universal human experiences that resonate across time. Timelessness is a quality that Jane Austen’s novels lack.”


Dr. Croft: “Dr. Hawkins seems to define Jane Austen’s novels by the spinoffs based on them, spinoffs that dramatize and exaggerate the romantic elements of the novels in a way that certainly does entertain but does not do justice to the complexity and precision of the actual works they claim to be inspired by. I believe that these Austen-inspired works and the continual reinvention of her timeless plots and characters add something important to academic studies of Jane Austen, testifying to her ongoing influence over people’s imagination; but first and foremost, we are here to talk about the six novels which Jane Austen herself wrote, and the only works which we can justifiably blame her for. (There is a brief ripple of laughter at this remark.) Jane Austen occupies a highly unusual niche in the world of literature in being a highly respected author in academic circles as well as a writer so ridiculously beloved that there are whole societies dedicated to her. Paraphernalia related to her name and novels – as Dr. Hawkins points out – fly off the shelves. Very few authors can claim this broad of an influence; the only one that comes to my mind is Shakespeare. Writers tend to carve out either an academic niche or a popular one, with minimal overlap, but Jane Austen somehow manages to have it all. Her popularity does not make her less worthy of academic respect, but more worthy of it. Even setting aside the people who only love the movies and haven’t read the books, there is an enormous and widespread community of people who genuinely love her novels and read them, not just once, but over and over again, for advice, comfort, wisdom, and a good laugh. She’s one of very few authors who consistently appear under “most famous authors” as well as “best loved authors,” and removing her from our reading list would reflect badly – not on her, but on us.

Come back for Part Two to hear the professors debate the next topic: whether and how Jane Austen influences those who read her novels.

Liv Quicksilver

Monday, March 31, 2025

College Tuition Math: A Crash Course


Confetti, indeed.

Writing college essays and submitting applications are but the precursors to the real question of your education, which turns (as so many things do) on money. "Nothing comes amiss, so money comes withal!"  the words of the shrewd servant Grumio sum up the dilemma of college quite nicely. 

The glittering college brochures promise to meet 90% of demonstrated need, disperse tens of thousands of dollars each year, and make all your dreams come true. Still, the fact remains that many private colleges (especially the well-regarded ones) have an annual tuition equal to the median US household income. Yet college seems like the only option for a successful and well-educated life – so what's to do? Welcome to Liv Quicksilver's crash course in college tuition math, offering elucidation (if not quite consolation) in this perplexing branch of mathematics. 

First, fill out the FAFSA and the CSS profile in order to determine your level of need and thus your expected family contribution. This contribution is likely to be about half your family's yearly income, and is thus in the same mathematical category as i in algebra: an imaginary number that just keeps popping up anyway.

Then it is time to look at financial aid offers from colleges. It is best for your mental health to think of college money offers as a gift from a beneficent godfather rather than a coupon from a business hoping to win your patronage along with most of your savings. A $25,000 scholarship is practically free money – not a 30% off coupon on a $83,000 tuition. 

Be sure to read through offers of financial aid very carefully. The average letter is likely to tell something like this one (lightly edited) which I recently received (the name of the school in question is Providence College, but for particular reasons I shall conceal it under the name of Snickersneeze University):

The direct cost of the privilege of attending Snickersneeze University is $84,430; while textbooks, loan fees, etc. bring your total cost to a moderate $87,570, per year (with about an 85% chance you'll graduate in four years). 

However, since we understand this amount of money may be hard to come up with all at once, we have generously granted you financial aid in the amount of $1,000 (which may be renewable after your first year, but no promises), bringing the total to a mere $86,570. 

Just in case you haven't planned properly and still need more help, the federal government will grudgingly loan you up to $5,500, as long as you mortgage your first-born child as surety. 

This brings your cost down to $81,070 per year, and the final amount you owe directly to Snickersneeze University is $77, 930  you have to keep track of the loan fees yourself. Fortunately, Snickersneeze University ranks among the top colleges in the nation for student drinking, so if you have any money left over you will be in good company drowning your anxiety in copious amounts of alcohol.  Yay for you! Submit your deposit and become a Sneezer today! 

No one will blame you if you need smelling salts and a glass of brandy after perusing this helpful document. Of course, you can always appeal for more financial aid...

Finally, you must remember to forget that college loans are the one type of loan that cannot be dissolved through declaring bankruptcy. This is key because you will almost certainly have to take out loans in order to pay the remainder of the tuition, and it would be unduly sobering to imagine thousands of dollars in college debt following you for the rest of your life like the Furies. That is the last thing you need as you set off to enjoy your college experience! 

In short, the bargain is a familiar one: give up all your current riches, mortgage your future treasure  don't think too hard, since it seems like the only option  and then sit back and enjoy while the university in question spins your head of straw into pure gold! 

Except this time...the name is what you're paying for.
And there's no loophole.
Good luck!

Liv Quicksilver




Thursday, December 26, 2024

The New College Essay Prompts

 The most selective universities and colleges of the United States have just released next year's prompts for the supplemental application essays. With wide-ranging topics and a variety of requirements, these prompts will surely delight applicants looking to spend several months laboring over essays someone will glance over for two minutes and then most likely reject. [Editor's notes included.] Enjoy! 

At Yale, we have many people doing many different things. We have many people doing the same thing. We also have lots of people doing other things. Reflect on this prompt and tell us what things you intend to bring to our wonderful campus. Limit: 50 words or 500 characters. 

Describe a particularly acrimonious argument you had with someone that went absolutely nowhere. At least 523 words, maximum.

Tell us about your life as it relates to Columbia. Strict limit: 17 words. 

We seek to enroll a class at Harvard that is diverse and creative, yet not too creative. Please write an essay about one way in which you have thought inside the box of being-outside-the-box. If this doesn't resonate with you, please rethink your life decisions. Between 500 and 650 words. [Yes, this is basically asking you to write a second personal essay. Who said life at Harvard would be easy?]

Be yourself. As long as it's the right kind of self. 63 words.

Please write a thoughtful essay on a surprising encounter with a unique person of Hispanic or Indigenous descent you've recently had during a representative community work or volunteer day or an interesting extracurricular activity. Required length: at least 400 words but no more than 401. [No one else knows what all those adjectives are useful for either.]

Write an essay about the hardships you've faced in your high school years while assuring us that you can afford a $80,000 per year tuition. Try not to think about the hardships this tuition will almost certainly cause you in college. 200 words, but only because we're feeling lenient. 

Please write an essay that shows how politically correct you are. Use as many clichés as possible. 21 to 412 words but must be an even number. 

Write a letter explaining why you and Brown University are a match made in heaven. Woo us but don't hit on us. [Figure it out.] Whatever length feels right as long as it's between 483 and 507 words and about three paragraphs. 

What does community mean to you as you hope to leave behind your own community for Princeton's? Reflect, relate, relax - but don't judge. Try not to remember that you'll almost certainly be rejected no matter what you write. Length: about two paragraphs, if they're good ones. Otherwise, strict limit of five sentences. 

At Cornell, we seek to build a class who will think along conventional lines and mostly agree with us on controversial issues. Therefore, write a 761-word essay about justice, inclusivity, diversity, adversity, university, perversity etc. [Whoops, looks like someone got a little carried away.] 

MIT: Write a letter to someone you know that tells one thing you've always wanted to say to them but never actually dared to. Send it off. Then prove you did it and give us a copy. We'll probably still reject you but at least your life will be more interesting.  

At Bryant, we greatly value giving back to the community. At the same time, we run a business, not a charity. Tell us how you intend to make money with a degree from Bryant while also paying back an alarmingly vague amount of student debt. Be specific. 79 words. 

Relate, reconsider, reduce, reuse, recycle, reconvene, reimagine, redo, regurgitate.            500 words.

Liv Quicksilver

Homeschool FAQS, Part One: Do You Have Social Skills?

The Encounter. If you're homeschooled, you get it. The casual, "Where do you go to school?" The practiced, "Oh, I’m homes...